Hollow-Core Fiber: A New Paradigm for Ultra-Low-Loss Datacenter Links

Figure 1: Hollow-core fiber design. (a) Schematic of a tubular anti-resonant HCF: light is confined in a central air core surrounded by thin nested glass capillaries. (b) Conventional single-mode fiber uses a solid glass core. The HCF core and cladding geometry (e.g. honeycomb-like rings of glass) causes light to bounce back into the air channel via photonic-bandgap or anti-resonant effects

Hollow-core fiber (HCF) replaces the glass core of conventional single-mode fiber (SMF) with an air-filled center. In practice HCF is built as a microstructured glass “jacket” surrounding a central air channel. Light is guided not by total internal reflection in glass but by photonic-bandgap or anti-resonant effects in the cladding. Figure 1 shows a common “revolver” anti-resonant design: a central air core with a ring of thin silica tubes. This leaves >99% of the optical mode in air, dramatically reducing interaction with glass. By contrast, an SMF has a solid Ge-doped silica core (∼9 μm diameter) within a lower-index glass cladding. Because the HCF core index (n≈1) is much lower than the cladding, special cladding structures are required to confine light.

Attenuation (Loss)

Conventional SMF has extremely low loss in the C-band (around 0.2 dB/km). For example, Corning SMF-28 ULL fiber is specified <0.16 dB/km at 1550 nm. In practice high-quality SMF spans 0.16–0.2 dB/km at 1550 nm. In comparison, early HCF prototypes had losses in the 1–10 dB/km range. Thanks to advances (nested anti-resonant designs, “revolver” HCF, etc.), HCF loss has plummeted: from ~1.3 dB/km (2018) to ~0.65 dB/km (2019) to ~0.28 dB/km (2020). Modern designs approach SMF levels: recent demonstrations report HCF loss falling below 0.2 dB/km, and lab prototypes have achieved ~0.11 dB/km. In short-reach datacenter links (tens of km), even 0.2–0.3 dB/km is acceptable, so HCF is nearing practical loss parity.

Attenuation benchmark: SMF (1550 nm) ≈0.16–0.2 dB/km; HCF (current) ≲0.2–0.3 dB/km (targeting ~0.1 dB/km).

The practical implication is that straight-through HCF links can span similar distances as SMF without repeater amplifiers. Because HCF avoids the glass core, its remaining loss is mainly leakage and surface scattering. Notably, as Rayleigh scattering is negligible in air, further loss reductions are possible by refining the anti-resonant structure. The net effect is that well-engineered HCF can rival conventional fiber on attenuation, at least over short to moderate distances.

Latency (Propagation Delay)

Because HCF guides light in air, its effective refractive index is near 1 (vs ~1.47 in glass). This means light travels significantly faster in HCF. In practice HCF reduces propagation delay by roughly 30–50%. For example, SMF has group delay ~2.0 µs/km, whereas published HCF designs show ~1.54 µs/km. In other words, an HCF link is ~31% lower latency per km. Figures 2a–b illustrates this speedup. (Note: some sources quote up to ~47% speed increase, depending on precise index differences.)

Figure 2: Speed advantage of hollow-core fiber. In air-core HCF (right), optical pulses propagate with ~50% higher velocity than in glass-core SMF (left). This yields about ~30–50% lower group delay (latency) per unit length. The diagram indicates that an HCF link can transmit the same data in roughly two-thirds the time of SMF.In practical terms, a 10 km HCF link would incur ~15 µs propagation delay (5 ns/m) versus ~20 µs in SMF, saving ~5 µs end-to-end. OFS measurements confirm ~1.54 µs/km for HCF vs ~2.24 µs/km for SMF (≈31% reduction). This latency saving is critical for AI/HPC data exchange and high-frequency trading. Indeed, industry tests consistently report ~30% latency improvement. (In a recent Madrid trial, a 1.386 km HCF link shaved 4.287 µs off the round-trip delay relative to SMF.) In summary:

Latency benchmark:SMF ≈2.0 µs/km; HCF ≈1.5–1.6 µs/km, i.e. ~30–35% less delay.

This “speed-of-light” advantage lets datacenters be spaced farther apart for a given latency budget. Equally, within a single DC or campus, HCF links dramatically reduce hop delays, which can help meet sub-microsecond end-to-end requirements of distributed AI trains.

Dispersion and Nonlinear Effects

HCF inherits very low dispersion. Because the bulk of light is in air, material dispersion (differing glass refractive index with wavelength) is negligible. Well-designed anti-resonant HCFs show near-zero chromatic dispersion over their low-loss bands. In practice this means pulses broaden very little, improving bandwidth-distance product. Similarly, polarization mode dispersion (PMD) in HCF is minimal, and environmental effects (temperature, stress) have less impact. By contrast, SMF has ~17 ps/(nm·km) chromatic dispersion at 1550 nm (with further variation across C/L band) and PMD on the order of 0.05–0.2 ps/√km in high-end fiber.

Nonlinear effects (Kerr nonlinearity, SPM/XPM, four-wave mixing, etc.) are orders-of-magnitude weaker in HCF. Over 99.99% of the mode is in air, so the effective nonlinear coefficient is ≈100–1000× smaller than in silica. This means HCF can support much higher optical power before nonlinear distortions set in, which in turn can enable higher spectral efficiency per channel or simpler modulation formats. It also yields enhanced security (easier to eavesdrop or inject by fiber tapping) as some proponents note.

Overall, dispersion-related bandwidth limits and nonlinearity constraints are far reduced in HCF. Datacenters can exploit broader wavelength bands (beyond standard C-band) for high-capacity links without needing dispersion compensation. The broad “first antiresonant window” of many HCF designs covers much of 1.5–1.6 µm with flat loss, and second windows can extend into L-band or even visible wavelengths with low loss. In sum, the bandwidth potential of HCF is at least as large as SMF and potentially larger, especially when multi-band operation and high launch powers are considered.

Bandwidth and Capacity

HCF’s high speed and low nonlinearity translate into exceptional capacity. By analogy, HCF is like a wider-lane, higher-speed highway for light: it can carry more “cars” (bits) moving faster. Figure 3 (right) illustrates this: a single HCF “super-van” can carry more data at higher speed than an SMF “car”. In practice, HCF has demonstrated very high aggregate data rates in lab trials. For example, trials have achieved 800 Gb/s and 1.2 Tb/s channels in antiresonant HCF with coherent WDM. In real networks, HCF has supported 6×100 Gb/s lanes on one fiber and similar multi-wavelength loads.

Figure 3: Data throughput analogy. HCF can act like a high-capacity “van” traveling faster, versus SMF as a “car.” This reflects HCF’s combination of high bandwidth (more wavelengths/modes with low distortion) and higher propagation speed. Unlike SMF (left), HCF avoids glass nonlinearities and can use broader spectral windows, enabling >Tb/s on a single fiber.

Key points on HCF capacity:

  • Wavelength range:HCF is not limited by the silica absorption “water peaks” and UV absorptions of SMF. New HCF designs work well from ~1200 nm up to ~1700 nm, and even into visible for specialized types.
  • WDM channels:Early tests show HCF carrying dozens of WDM channels (C+L band) with minimal nonlinear crosstalk.
  • Modulation formats:Because nonlinearity is low, HCF can more easily carry high-order modulation (e.g. 64QAM) at high power per channel.
  • Bit-rate:With coherent detection, HCF should support the same per-channel bit-rates as SMF (100 Gb/s+ per wavelength); early trials at 100–600 Gb/s wavelengths have succeeded.

In summary, HCF offers at least the same potential bandwidth as SMF and, in multi-channel links, can often exceed it through higher launch power and lower crosstalk. The only caveat is that many HCF types have a finite low-loss window, so full fiber C+L+U band use may require multiple fiber types or optimized dispersion-engineered designs.

Fabrication and Practical Challenges

While HCF’s physics are promising, several engineering challenges remain:

  • Complex Preforms:HCF preforms (the glass rod structures) are intricate. They require stacking multiple thin capillary tubes, which demands high-precision fabrication and draw control. As a result, current HCF is made in limited volume. Scaling manufacturing to the tens of thousands of km of DC fiber links will take more development and new production lines.
  • Splicing and Connectors:HCF cannot directly mate with standard fiber connectors. So terminations use short conventional SMF pigtails. In practice, industry uses fusion splicing of HCF to SMF holders in LC/SC connectors. Reported splice losses range from ~0.5 dB (optimized) up to ~2.5 dB. Any connector/pigtail adds ~0.5 dB. These extra losses (per link) are significant compared to a transceiver budget in a DC. Low-loss HCF splices and new low-cost connector solutions are active R&D areas.
  • Bend and Packaging Sensitivity:HCF (especially large-core designs) is more sensitive to bending and micro-bending than SMF. Bends introduce loss and can convert modes. To mitigate this, HCF cables use loose-tube or ribbon construction with large bend radii. Special attention is needed to prevent strain during installation. In lab tests, HCF on rigid reels showed acceptable behavior, but real cabling (with minimal disturbance) can actually increase higher-order mode interference unless designed with mode filters. OFS and others have added “shunt” structures to deliberately strip higher-order modes and suppress modal dispersion.
  • Splice and Fiber Loss:The record low losses (≪0.2 dB/km) have been measured on “bare” HCF strands. Cabling, splicing, and environmental factors (contamination, humidity) typically raise loss. For example, OFS reported that cabling their HCF added ~0.1–0.7 dB/km loss in C-band. Thus, real-world deployed loss might be ~0.3–0.5 dB/km until processes mature.
  • Cost and Availability:HCF currently carries a price premium, as noted by industry experts. Early deployments (e.g. BT/Lumenisity for the London Stock Exchange) are niche use-cases where cost is justified. To become mainstream in DC interconnects, production volumes must scale and material costs fall. Several new ventures (Relativity Networks, Lumenisity, SilenFiber, etc.) are building out HCF production with VC funding and acquisitions.

In summary, practical HCF links today may require careful handling: fusion spliced connectors, large slack loops, and specialized cables. The industry is actively developing standards and best practices. For example, OFS AccuCore™ cables are now offered for HCF with standard form factors. However, every HCF link still incurs roughly 0.5–3 dB of extra loss for cabling/splices, limiting reach and necessitating power budgeting.

Trials and Prototypes in Datacenter Settings

HCF is already moving out of the lab into real networks. Recent field trials and pilot deployments show promising results:

  • DC-to-DC Links:In February 2024, Spanish operator Lyntia teamed with Nokia, OFS|Furukawa and Digital Realty to deploy a hollow-core cable between a POP and a Madrid data center. Over a 1.386 km HCF link, they achieved a round-trip latency reduction of 287 µs (>30%) compared to SMF, while carrying 600 Gb/s on a single wavelength. This real-world test used coherent transponders at 100 Gb/s per λ. The trial confirmed that HCF can be spliced into existing infrastructure (OFS AccuCore® cable) with standard coherent gear, opening the door for DC interconnects.
  • Short-Reach Links:OFS Labs demonstrated a 3.1 km HCF link carrying 10 Gb/s DWDM traffic (10 wavelengths) for trading networks. This was the first cabled HCF transmission, showing bit-error-free 10Gb/s over fiber+cable with a 31% latency reduction. Similarly, Nokia/Bell Labs have tested HCF at 800–1200 Gb/s aggregate (8×100Gb/s) in lab setups.
  • Financial and Trading Networks:HCF’s latency savings have attracted high-frequency trading (HFT) use-cases. In 2021, Lumenisity (now part of Nokia) and euNetworks deployed hollow-core links to connect London’s Stock Exchange. By using HCF for the last-mile to trading venues, microsecond latencies are reduced. Such deployments mark some of the first commercial uses of HCF. (BT and others have also piloted HCF for mobile backhaul and secure networks, though these are outside DCs.)
  • AI/HPC Data Exchanges:While public data is limited, major cloud providers are investigating HCF. Microsoft Azure has formed a team (formerly Lumenisity) to prototype HCF links between data centers. Relativity Networks (a US start-up) is developing HCF specifically for AI datacenter fabrics. These efforts aim to exploit HCF’s speed to alleviate latency bottlenecks in distributed AI training. Although still early, these initiatives underline the technology’s potential in hyperscale and HPC environments.

In all these trials, performances met expectations: significant latency drops (typically ~30%) and multi-hundred-Gbps capacities on short links. However, none of these trials yet extend HCF hundreds of km – that remains future work. For now, HCF is best suited to metro-scale or intra-datacenter links (up to ~10–20 km), where its benefits shine without requiring active repeaters.

Outlook: AI/HPC and Future Datacenter Networks

The push toward AI and ultra-fast HPC is heightening demand for ultra-low-latency, ultra-high-bandwidth links. HCF is uniquely positioned to address these needs. By reducing link delay ~30% per km, HCF lets DC operators stretch geographic coverage: analyses suggest data centers could be placed 1.5× farther apart for the same latency. This “geographic flexibility” can be crucial as AI clusters span multiple sites. Likewise, within a data center, HCF can cut inter-rack and inter-pod latencies, feeding large models with minimal data transfer lag.

Beyond raw speed, HCF’s low nonlinearity and broad spectrum support mean future transceivers can push data rates even higher. Combined with advanced modulation and parallel fiber schemes (e.g. multicore HCF), the overall throughput could greatly exceed today’s SMF links. Providers envision HCF carrying terabit-per-second traffic per strand in the next decade, meeting the exascale I/O needs of AI chips.

Industry is taking notice. Major cloud/HPC players (Microsoft, Google, Meta) have funded HCF R&D or acquisitions, and startups (Relativity, Lumenisity) have secured millions in venture and government backing. Standards bodies and consortia are beginning to include HCF in future network plans. While many uncertainties remain (cost, reliability, integration), the trend is clear: HCF is on track to become a key building block for next-generation low-latency, high-capacity datacenter networks.

In conclusion, hollow-core fiber represents a compelling advancement for data-center optics. By swapping glass for air, it cuts loss and latency while expanding bandwidth and linearity. Early trials prove its viability, and ongoing developments are rapidly overcoming practical hurdles. For AI and HPC deployments that demand “light-speed” networking, HCF offers an unmatched path forward – provided its remaining engineering and cost challenges can be solved.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Contact US

If you want to know more about us, you can fill out the form to contact us and we will answer your questions at any time.